I know HEAT development is still ongoing, but what is in the future of FIMK?
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
OK, I got it figured out and run a test against my own accounts. I now need to clean up the script a bit, test again, and then get the OPEN.FIMK that will replace the asset I am transferring back to myself.
In your OpenLedger logs, you will see an "Override Transfer" operation. This is me transferring your existing FIMKRYPTO assets back me, the issuer. I will then send you OPEN.FIMK as a replacement.
Again, I will only be doing these transfers for anyone having greater than 1 FIMKRYPTO
Nothing new... I'm trying to figure out how to stop trading, so that no one can get conned into trading for FIMKRYPTO but not being able to cash out. I want to end the asset right. Bitshares says it has the ability for me to stop trading and transfer asset back to myself, but so far, I haven't found anyone who knows how.
Keep trading for now if you want. I am still trying to figure out how do to this...
I still have FIMKRYPTO balance and trading strong. Any news?
Have you considered, when will the related exchange pairs be closed? At the same time or just a little bit before closing donw the gateway?
Forgot to mention: I had to restore from a backup from December a couple of times on both of my servers before they started staying on the main chain.
This seems to have caused some instability in the network: for example my server and Warmach's pool have forked several times. Could you have a look, what might be wrong?
Earth calling warmach
I'm not sure, if that would help. If I've understood correctly, the number of servers (and the distribution of balances between the servers) is more relevant than the number of forging accounts. If you have multiple accounts forging on the same server, wouldn't they all end up in the same fork*? At least the opposite is true: I have one account forging on 2-3 servers at a time, and the servers end up in forks independently of each other. And only the "correct" one is shown in lompsa.com, of course.
What might work better, could be that warmach and/or any other "too" large server split in two, dividing the balance between two servers. For a pool, it would require moving half of the forgers (balances) to another server. For starters, warmach could move his own balance forging to another (account and) server. Also the forging support from association could run on multiple servers (if not already running). What do you think?
Is this asset still on sale somewhere and buyable and doing money for the owners?
Ideally, the "fairness" should be close to 1 for everyone, but because of (intended) randomness of the algorithms, occasional forking and/or downtime there are variations. But as you can see, even small forgers can get a fair share of the cake, if they can keep their servers up and running.
To support the small forgers, I decided to give 10 000 FIMK to each of those forging with less than a million FIMK. Beware, there might be similar rags in the future! And if somebody can convince me that they might start forging and commit to the task, I can make a donation up to 100k. Just private message me, and make your "business plan pitch"!
Could you tune down Krypto Fin ry forging support? Now it's forging a lot more than its stake suggests, so maybe there are forking problems again. At least all of the pools have dropped off from the list: