Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Eliphaz Fimk

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 55
31
I don't think so.  I think the seller of this asset cashed out his FIMK stake.
Were there some conditions / agreements about the FIMK tied to the asset, or was it just based on good faith and kind of a gambling game setup?

32
Technical Discussion / Re: Network status
« on: November 11, 2016, 10:42:08 PM »
Can't say for sure, but I'd suspect that it's been forking off and back on.
From my very limited investigations I also concur this is likely the case. The block resolve algorithms of current generation cryptocurrencies really aren't designed for such a small and unproportional distribution of nodes. Yet, from Dirk's ingenious fork auto-resolution algorithms he developed at the peak of success  ;D the nodes seem to get back running autonomously, which I consider quite a feat and very positive amidst all the unconfortable stuff. AFAIK unique in the crypto sphere.

33
Technical Discussion / Re: Network status
« on: November 09, 2016, 08:54:09 PM »
Your network monitoring has been really helpful!  :thumbup:

Quote
"perstuntuma" (I offer a beer for a good translation)

Kinda hunch.

We owe you one for the FIMK activism anyway :)


34
Technical Discussion / Re: Forking problem again?
« on: November 08, 2016, 11:30:05 AM »
Or not? Still forging/forking and causing instability in the network.
It was switched off, then back on, because without it the pool seems to regain dominating position.

Instability? I thought the "instability" arises from warmach's pool getting >51% control. What kind of instability does balancing the largest forgers with forging support cause?

35
Yleinen FIMK-keskustelu / Re: Perustulo on maksettu
« on: November 05, 2016, 03:20:07 AM »
Perustulo 11/2016 maksettu, saajia jälleen 195.

36
Technical Discussion / Re: Forking problem again?
« on: November 05, 2016, 12:22:02 AM »
Forging support switched off for now.

Monitoring situation for the 50% ball on warmach's pool

Corporate backend jks certificates mismatch has been fixed, so Lompsa.com and thin clients should be operating normally now after a day of downtime.

37
Technical Discussion / Re: Forking problem again?
« on: October 21, 2016, 11:21:15 PM »
Thanks for the insightful post, warmach. Valid points.
I think it is pretty narrow minded thinking to be only worried if there is a direct monetary incentive.
Indeed. When you read my comment with a certain mindset -

So to be alerted there would need to be something specific that pulls the situation towards manifesting that risk, which I guess there doesn't exist?

It should be clear that it was loaded rhetoric aimed to probe your / the community's understanding about possible motives beyond the directly observed circumstances. Maybe I structured it too politely to make sure to not incriminate your status, however the conclusion is obvious: The chances for ulterior motives aren't far beyond the surface. So the safety measures we do take are important.

38
Technical Discussion / Re: Forking problem again?
« on: October 21, 2016, 01:17:33 AM »
3 accounts (2M, 3M, 16M association) have been added to the forging power, so the circumstances should normalize without changes to your pool.

Quote
I would like a serious response from FIMK developers on the current state of the network.  And recommended steps to move forward.

You know the state of the network. There are few forgers. If there's 50% attack risk occasionally, then there is. Risk is a potential which can only manifest under certain circumstances. When you warmach control the pool, and as a respected FIMK community member you have control over such a stake, I'm not worried at all about such theoretical risk manifesting. There's no monetary incentive to rewrite the blockchain even if it was possible, and also it's not technically extremely simple to do so. So to be alerted there would need to be something specific that pulls the situation towards manifesting that risk, which I guess there doesn't exist?

However, it's good to state such concerns in public. Whenever such concerns arise, we'll try to do what is necessary to alleviate the situation.

39
Finnish humor asking to send 1.9 FIMK with an OSX client to verify..
Heh :) You should be fine by sending just 1 FIMK.

40
Technical Discussion / Re: Forking problem again?
« on: October 18, 2016, 07:09:12 PM »
Who decides which one of the car dealers will have to refund/default and which vehicle the repo man *) goes after?
Why, it's me or Dirk of course! We'll roll dice.

Or if we're having a good stint, I'll refund one and Dirk goes after the other Tesla.

41
Technical Discussion / Re: Forking problem again?
« on: October 16, 2016, 06:07:59 PM »
I feel like FIMK is dying...

Those feelings are greatly exaggerated and premature etc. ;)

FWIK the network should be fine with just a single forger.

42
Technical Discussion / Re: Forking problem again?
« on: October 15, 2016, 08:06:07 PM »
How are our forks doing? Any nice ones around lately  :P? (been receiving some reports of forking, but stuff looks quite ok at https://lompsa.com/#/activity/fim/forgers/latest )

43
Muut asiat & huumori / Re: Etusivu ei päivity?
« on: October 15, 2016, 08:04:32 PM »
Ongelma on nyt orjattu, ilmeisesti myös yksityisviestien kohdalta.

44
Muut asiat & huumori / Re: Etusivu ei päivity?
« on: October 12, 2016, 10:00:57 PM »
Oliko ajatusta, milloin tuon saisi korjattua? Nyt on mennyt reilu kuukausi...
On todennäköistä, että yksityisviestien timestamppeja ei korjata. Ne ovat eri juttu kuin forum-viestit, jotka tullaan korjaamaan. Ei olla ehditty katsomaan, mutta yksityisviestit luultavasti jouduttaisiin katsomaan yksitellen läpi per käyttäjä, ja kun ne ovat tässä forum-softassa kryptaamattomia niin ei puhettakaan että lähtisin jo yksityisyyssyistä tuollaista vääntämään edes vaikkei työ olisi suuri (mitä se on).

45
Muut asiat & huumori / Re: Etusivu ei päivity?
« on: October 11, 2016, 09:05:44 PM »
Johtuisiko siitä, että "uudemmat" vuoden 2018 viestit näkyvät edelleen ennen sitä? Svante huhuu... ?
Varmaankin johtuu. Yksityisviestit saapuvat välittömästi, mutta eivät tietenkään näy listassa päällimmäisenä jos siellä on v. 2018 lähetettyjä viestejä.

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 55