Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - eRoh

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 22
31
Technical Discussion / Re: Forking problem again?
« on: October 19, 2016, 07:37:24 PM »
Another reason to have more (benevolent and/or small) forgers?:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proof-of-stake#Criticism

... or correct me if I'm the clueless one...

32
Technical Discussion / Re: Forking problem again?
« on: October 19, 2016, 08:40:32 AM »
We have only 9 forgers. The network can't survive with only a few forgers. We need more people. I am thinking about closing my pool in the hope that people will forge and stabilize the network. If I do, I will give plenty of notice.

That is a good idea, because "... Also, a person with such a large stake in the network would be taking a big risk with their own wealth by attacking the network in a way which may undermine its credibility. ..."

I don't mean that you would be considering an attack, but showing that you don't want to have too much forging power is a good signal to the community.

See http://cryptorials.io/glossary/51-attack/ for details.

Now everybody start forging!  :cheers:

33
Technical Discussion / Re: Forking problem again?
« on: October 19, 2016, 08:19:27 AM »
Sorry for the dumb questions, but I can't figure out which one of us is more clueless (or pretends to be). ;-P

This conversation makes me wonder that question more and more...

34
Technical Discussion / Re: Forking problem again?
« on: October 17, 2016, 07:51:03 AM »
FWIK the network should be fine with just a single forger.

Doesn't sound quite distributed to me. :-o

Edit: Maybe a single forger is ok, but what if there are two forgers, who for some reason are disconnected from each other (but are connected to Internet or at least think they are)? Then a user manages to spend his/her entire balance via both forgers and buy two brand new Tesla Model S's. Who decides which one of the car dealers will have to refund/default and which vehicle the repo man *) goes after?

*) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Repo

Sorry for the dumb questions, but I can't figure out which one of us is more clueless (or pretends to be). ;-P

35
Technical Discussion / Re: Forking problem again?
« on: October 15, 2016, 09:50:09 PM »
Would the network be more stable, if we had more individual forgers? Just a thought...

36
Technical Discussion / Re: Forking problem again?
« on: October 15, 2016, 08:28:07 PM »
How are our forks doing? Any nice ones around lately  :P? (been receiving some reports of forking, but stuff looks quite ok at https://lompsa.com/#/activity/fim/forgers/latest )

I think FIMKers' Pool™ is still forging a lot less than it should considering the effective balance. I personally have had some forks, but have been able to resolve them manually by restarting the server and/or restoring from a recent backup.

37
Muut asiat & huumori / Re: Etusivu ei päivity?
« on: October 12, 2016, 06:36:45 AM »
Varmaankin johtuu. Yksityisviestit saapuvat välittömästi, mutta eivät tietenkään näy listassa päällimmäisenä jos siellä on v. 2018 lähetettyjä viestejä.
Oliko ajatusta, milloin tuon saisi korjattua? Nyt on mennyt reilu kuukausi...

38
Muut asiat & huumori / Re: Etusivu ei päivity?
« on: October 11, 2016, 06:29:29 AM »
Komento takaisin... olikin vanhempi viesti eli varmaankin aiemman kellon sekoilun aikoihin lähetetty, uusinta viestiä ei edes näy...
Johtuisiko siitä, että "uudemmat" vuoden 2018 viestit näkyvät edelleen ennen sitä? Svante huhuu... ?

39
Technical Discussion / Re: Forking problem again?
« on: October 06, 2016, 08:40:05 PM »
There are several long streaks of blocks forged by individual forgers, one at a time. Now the distribution seems more random. Everything ok? Svante, Dirk?

However, there seems to be only 9 forgers at the moment, there is still room for volunteers...

40
Technical Discussion / Forking problem again?
« on: October 06, 2016, 08:54:56 AM »
I got into a fork during yesterday/today. I have two servers that both forked at somewhat different time, so could there be a problem in the network?

Edit: Forgot to mention, that I restored the other server's database from a backup in September, but it forked again.

41
Markkinat ja treidaus / Re: Markkinakatsaus
« on: September 21, 2016, 03:55:50 PM »

42
Markkinat ja treidaus / Re: Markkinakatsaus
« on: September 21, 2016, 07:30:40 AM »
Nyt voi taas ostaa satasella:
http://cryptofresh.com/a/OPEN.HEAT_OPEN.BTC
ja myydä kahdella:
https://alcurex.com/#HEAT-BTC

43
Muut asiat & huumori / Re: Etusivu ei päivity?
« on: September 20, 2016, 07:12:02 AM »
Luulin, että foorumilla ei muutamaan päivään ole ollut uusia viestejä, mutta johtuukin siitä että etusivulle ei ilmesty tietoa niistä?

Ehtisikö joku selvittämään tätä?

44
Markkinat ja treidaus / Re: Markkinakatsaus
« on: September 20, 2016, 07:10:12 AM »
Joku nokittelee Alcurexissa:
https://alcurex.com/#HEAT-BTC

Ja sama homma.

Edelleen. Heh heh.

45
General FIMK Discussion / Re: Where have all the forgers gone?
« on: September 17, 2016, 06:47:02 AM »
Still having problems with FIMKers Pool. It wanders off every second day... Is anyone else experiencing anything similar?

It seems to be down again...

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 22